松本 マスミ

http://www.cieej.or.jp/toefl/webmagazine/educators-voice/1303/index.html

編集および執筆

本稿では,これまでの生成文法の研究成果が,I. 生成文法の言語観,II. 生成文法の方法論,III. 言語事実に関して生成文法が与えうる新知見という3つの点で,英語教育における効果的指導にどのように活用できるかを議論する。説明的妥当性を満たすような理論を追求するという生成文法の姿勢が英語教育に対してもつ意味についても論じたい。This paper discusses how studies of generative grammar can lead to an effective teaching in English education at least in three important respects: I. view of language, II. methodology, III. knowledge on linguistic data. It also discusses what the attitude to seek the explanatory adequacy of a linguistic theory means in English education.

特別寄稿論文

平成２０年度学長裁量経費特別枠配分 区分：教養学科学士課程教育再構築経費として

松本担当分は、ｐ。１７－ｐ。２５．

英語の非能格動詞の自他交替を統語的分析によって統一的に説明するというのが本研究の目的である。英語の同族目的語構文,非特定的目的語削除構文を含む交替においては,語彙部門における編入と降格という統語的操作が働いていることを示す。さらに,統語構造においても標準的目的語が空代名詞として生じ,総称演算子によって認可されることを論じる。This paper attempts to give a unified syntactic account of transitive/intransitive alternations of English unergative verbs. We will analyze the cognate object construction and the unspecified object deletion construction by means of Lexical Relational Structure proposed by Hale and Keyser (1991). We will also refer to the classification of English verbs by Levin (1993) to consider the relation of verbs in these two constructions. We will show that the verbs which are used in these constructions derive through the syntactic process of incorporation or demotion. We will argue that the canonical object, which plays a key role in Lexicon, also appears in Syntax as a null pronoun and that it is licensed by the generic operator.

This paper proposes a unified analysis of the cognate object construction and the intransitive unergative sentence. Based on the assumption that the cognate object construction is an alternation of the unergative construction, the lexical and syntactic structures of the two constructions are presented. It is argued that the three readings of the cognate object construction correspond to the three-way distinction between DP and NP proposed in Borer (1994). This correspondence enables us to explore not only the cognate object construction but also the cognate object itself, focusing on referentiality and event structure.∗. © 1996, The English Linguistic Society of Japan. All rights reserved.

「被作用性」という概念は〔8〕〔10〕〔17〕のような統語的研究においても言及されてきた。本論では,被作用性の概念を純枠に統語的メカニズムに置き換えることを試みる。中間動詞構文,受動文,疑似受動文に対して被作用性という名で別々に課されていた制約が〔3〕の派生の経済性に統一して還元されるのである。The notion"affectedness"has been referred to in syntactic approaches including Jaeggli(1986),Roberts(1987),and Tenny(1987),among others.This paper attempts to reduce the notion of affectedness to purely syntactic mechanisms.The constraints imposed on such constructions as middles,passives,and pseudopassives in the name of affectedness are subsumed under Chomsky's(1992)Economy Principle.