Shigetaka Yoshida

type:Article 2022年4月に教員養成フラッグシップ大学に指定されたことに伴い,大阪教育大学では先導的・革新的な教員養成カリキュラム・教職科目の研究・開発が求められている。本学が掲げるテーマは「ダイバーシティ大阪の諸課題に応え,学習者の学びに寄り添う教師の育成」であり,本プロジェクトでは,プロジェクトメンバーの専門領域の観点から,本学のフラッグシップ構想,とりわけダイバーシティ科目群について,国内外の状況をふまえながら,その方向性と課題を明らかにすることを目的として検討を進めてきた。本稿では,最初に人権教育,インクルーシブ教育,外国にルーツのある子どもの教育の3領域について,関連領域の教員による報告に基づいて,日本および大阪の現状と課題について検討した。つぎに,それをふまえた上で,対話的な学びの観点から見たダイバーシティ科目の授業の在り方・評価の在り方について検討を行ったうえで,「ダイバーシティ大阪」の諸課題に取り組む上で必要とされる,教員を目指す学生に対して学部段階で身に付けてほしい資質・能力について提言を行った。 Having received the designation of a “Flagship University for Teacher Training" in April 2022, Osaka Kyoiku University (OKU) is turning its attention to researching and developing pioneering and innovative teacher training curricula and teaching courses. The theme for OKU is “Educating Teachers Who Respond to the Various Challenges of `Diversity Osaka' and Support Learners' Learning." In this project, we have been examining the direction and issues of the flagship concept of the university, especially the development of diversity-related courses, in relation to the project members' specialized fields while taking the state of affairs in Japan and overseas into consideration as well. This paper first examines the current situation and issues in Japan, especially in Osaka, drawing on reports from three related fields: human rights education, inclusive education, and education for foreign children. From this, we discussed the way that diversity-related courses should be taught and evaluated in relation to the perspective of active learning and dialogic learning, proposing the qualities and abilities that students who intend to become teachers should acquire while at the undergraduate level.

type:紀要論文 Article

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the characteristics of Ernst Meyer's group instruction in relation to frontal instruction. In this paper, the following three points are analyzed. (1) In the historical development of German didactics, how Ernst Meyer's group instruction is positioned is clarified. (2) Ernst Meyer's frontal instruction and the form of his instruction are clarified, and the position of Ernst Meyer's group instruction in the theory of the instructional form is analyzed. (3) Herbert Gudjons revalues both group instruction and frontal instruction today. The Gudjons theory is clarified, and Ernst Meyer's group instruction is compared with the Gudjons theory.

This paper aimed to explore a new type lesson plan connecting learning objectives to long-term educational aims. To this aim, we examined the W. H. Peterßen's WPM model which is close to our idea. At first, we introduce the concept and theory of WPM model. Next, we introduce the examples of lesson plan, the examples of Grundschule and Hauptschule in this paper and Realschule and Gymnasium in another paper. After these examination, we argued the educational meaning of WPM model.

The purpose of this paper is to clarify Ernst Meyer's theory of group instruction after World War II in Germany. First of all, the background of Ernst Meyer's theory of group instruction is considered pursuing the origin of group instruction and his motive to study group instruction. After this consideration, his studies of group instruction are overviewed. Ernst Meyer examined the concepts of "group" and "collective" in his studies. He proposed "Learning in Freedom" in instruction. Interactions among children were intended there. This paper analysed the interactions among chirdern based on cases, and his conception of "group" and "collective". As a result, the following are clarified. He insisted on the importance of instruction with interactions among chirdren through "arrangements", "improvisations", and "mediating helps" against the authoritative teacher-centered instruction. As for the concept of "collective", it was not denied in all parts, but the totalitarian value and absolutistic norm were criticized by him.

The purpose of this research is to clarify historical development of der Gruppenunterricht in Germany after World War II. Der Gruppenunterricht mentioned in this research is a lesson conducted in small groups within the class. In this research, the history of der Gruppenunterricht is divided into three periods as below : 1. Democratization and der Gruppenunterricht (1950s to 1960s) 2. Emanzipatorische Erziehung and der Gruppenunterricht (late 1960s to 1980s) 3. The German unification and der Gruppenunterricht (after the 1990s)